Kendal Gast
ENV S 342
News Report
2-12-16
Korea
The
Korean peninsula has received a fair amount of press over the past few
weeks. North Korea, with a high degree
of speculation, tested a nuclear device in January and most recently launched a
rocket into space under the guise of putting a satellite in orbit. South Korea recently cut utilities to a joint
factory in North Korea. South Korea also
faces drought throughout the country and controversy over where local communities
should obtain food. All this with the
recent development of a high-ranking North Korean official apparently executed
by order of Kim Jong Un himself.
In
the Kaesong zone in North Korea, South Korea shut off power and in turn water
to an industrial park in the area. It
happened after North Korea decided to force workers to leave and freeze assets
held by various South Korean companies. But
South Korea claims it shut off power due to a rocket launch on Sunday the 7th. North Korea called this provocation an “act
of war” (Reuters 2016). The article then
states: “Kaesong had been shut only once before,
for five months in 2013, amid heightened tensions following its [North Korea’s]
third nuclear test” (Reuters 2016). In
other words, this has happened before, and more specifically the third test
happened a day before President Obama gave a state of the union address on
February 12th, 2013. It is
ironic that three years ago a similar incident happened in the same week,
during the same month of the year.
In 2016, a new event coincides with
the rocket tests and displays of aggressions towards neighboring
countries. A high-ranking North Korean
army general was apparently executed within the last two weeks. For reasons according to the CNN article as
“factionalism, misuse of authority and corruption” (McKirdy 2016), the officer
was executed. It is unclear how a town
shutdown, a rocket being launched, and an execution could be related.
To negotiate for a nuclear-free state of North Korea is
not a possible path for the United States.
The U.S. has tried for years to negotiate with North Korea to end its
nuclear research program with little success.
The events of the past two weeks only escalate speculation and anxiety
for most of the world. Luckily, an
article in the Washington Quarterly offers hope: “If we are to make
progress with the North Koreans, whether through regime change or a process of
negotiation, it will be through Beijing and Seoul” (Hill 2013). In the article, the author discusses the
various and complicated reasons why nuclear disarmament of North Korea is
necessary and the short history of the issue.
Among outside factors, the cause of so many failings in negotiations was
largely due to the U.S. Perhaps one of
the reasons North Korea feels it must prove itself is the whole Korean
peninsula’s struggle with food production.
Although
South Korea has an above average yearly rainfall compared to the rest of the
world, the country still faces water and irrigation problems. According to Nam et al, “South Korea is one
of the countries classified as water deficient by the United Nations, and, in
recent years, has experienced serious droughts and water scarcity problems”
(Nam et al 2015). As the article goes on
to discuss, the primary reason for using the collected data was to predict the
future of climatic conditions in South Korea.
This is turn will lead to better management and thus response to
emergency events like extreme drought.
But this will not happen if South Korea cannot figure out its food
retention issues.
Over
the past few years, South Korea has struggled with food production and food
policy. According to Hwang, “Koreans
depend on the import of over 70% of their foods” (Hwang 2013). Furthermore, “over the last 50 years, Korean
agriculture and rural communities have substantially declined” (Hwang 2013). Because of this, the article goes on to
discuss clever, modern day solutions to the issue such as cooperatives, farmers
markets, and policy aimed at protecting rural farmers from transnational corporations. With these issues in mind, it is not wonder
that South Koreans rely heavily on foreign aid and an alliance with the United
States.
A
strong argument for no nuclear weapons in North Korea can be made on the basis
of utilitarianism with the addition of non-maleficence. The countries surrounding North Korea do not
wish to be attacked by a missile strike any more or less than the United
States, even though the focus seems to be on the U.S. This is perhaps because of our country’s
willingness to become involved in other countries politics and pointing out
“wrong” things done by them. The UN,
along with the U.S., has strongly encouraged North Korea to do no harm to
others and have sought peace at every negotiation. Outsiders of North Korea are also acutely
aware of the suffering and oppression the people face under Kim Jong Un’s harsh
rule. Either way, removing the worry of
nuclear warheads will benefit the entire planet.
Works Cited
Hill C. 2013. The Elusive
Vision of a Non-Nuclear North Korea, 36:2: pp. 18. Feb. 08, 2016.
Hwang S. 2013. Mobilizing
Agri-Food Movements: Roles of Alternative Agri-Food Systems in Addressing the
Rural Crisis in South Korea, 47:09: pp. 5. Feb. 08, 2016.
Kim J, Reinhold T,
(Reuters). Feb. 2016. South Korea Cuts Off Power, Water into Kaesong Zone in
North Korea. Feb. 11, 2016. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-satellite-kaesong-power-idUSKCN0VK2KV?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&utm_source=twitter
McKirdy E, (Central News
Network). Feb. 2016, Ranking North Korean Army Officer Said to be Executed by
Regime. Feb. 11, 2016. http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/10/asia/north-korea-army-chief-ri-yong-gil-executed/index.html
Nam W, Hayes MJ, Svoboda
M, Tsegayet T, Wilhile D. 2015. Draught Hazard Assessment in the Context of
Climate Change for South Korea, 160: pp. 107. Feb 08, 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment